What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
Friendship
Transgender identity and experience
Gender, gaming and pop culture
Richard Rorty and America
Women philosophers in antiquity
Time in the time of COVID
Stability, security and survival: a conversation with Mary Graham
Libertarianism
The Cynics
The philosophy of biology
Banality, deception and evil
Defining Aboriginality
Race, biology and medicine
Is there purpose in the cosmos?
Power, domination and the ethics of global philanthropy
Poverty and punishment
Free will, consciousness and AI: a conversation with Daniel Dennett
René Girard and victimhood
Beauty and AI
The pathology of ugliness
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Cult of Conspiracy
Alan Watts Being in the Way